Attempt at mardown conversion

applications/CHAC_anisotropy/CHAC_anisotropy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+## PRISMS-PF: CHAC Anisotropy (with Coupled CH-AC Dynamics)
+Consider a free energy expression of the form:
+
+$$
+\begin{equation}
+  \Pi(c, \eta, \nabla  \eta) = \int_{\Omega}    \left( f_{\alpha}(1-H) + f_{\beta}H \right)  + \frac{1}{2} | \gamma( \mathbf{n} ) \nabla  \eta |^2   ~dV 
+\end{equation}
+$$
+
+where $f_{\alpha}$ and $f_{\beta}$ are the free energy densities corresponding to $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively, and are functions of composition $c$. $H$ is a function of the structural order parameter $\eta$.  The interface normal vector $\mathbf{n}$ is given by 
+
+$$
+\begin{equation}
+\mathbf{n} = \frac{\nabla \eta}{|\nabla \eta|}
+\end{equation}
+$$
+
+for $\nabla \eta \ne \mathbf{0}$, and $\mathbf{n} = \mathbf{0}$ when $\nabla \eta = \mathbf{0}$.
+
+## Variational Treatment
+
+Following standard variational arguments (see Cahn-Hilliard formulation), we obtain the chemical potentials:
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+  \mu_{c}  &= (f_{\alpha,c}(1-H)+f_{\beta,c}H)  \\
+  \mu_{\eta}  &= (f_{\beta,c}-f_{\alpha,c})H_{,\eta} - \nabla \cdot \mathbf{m}
+\end{align}
+$$
+
+The components of the anisotropic gradient $\mathbf{m}$ are given by
+
+$$
+\begin{equation}
+m_i = \gamma(\mathbf{n}) \left( \nabla \eta + |\nabla \eta| (\delta_{ij}-n_i n_j) \frac{\partial \gamma (\mathbf{n})}{n_j} \right),
+\end{equation}
+$$
+
+where $\delta_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta.
+
+## Kinetics
+
+Now the PDE for Cahn-Hilliard dynamics is given by:
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+  \frac{\partial c}{\partial t} &= -~\nabla \cdot (-M_c\nabla \mu_c)\\
+  &=M_c~\nabla \cdot (\nabla (f_{\alpha,c}(1-H)+f_{\beta,c}H)) 
+  \end{align}
+$$
+
+and the PDE for Allen-Cahn dynamics is given by:
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+  \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t} &= -M_\eta \mu_\eta \\
+  &=-M_\eta ~ ((f_{\beta,c}-f_{\alpha,c})H_{,\eta} - \nabla \cdot \mathbf{m}) 
+\end{align}
+$$
+
+where $M_c$ and $M_\eta$ are the constant mobilities. 
+
+## Time discretization
+
+Considering forward Euler explicit time stepping, we have the time discretized kinetics equation:
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+ \eta^{n+1} &= \eta^{n}  - \Delta t M_{\eta}~ ((f_{\beta,c}^n-f_{\alpha,c}^n)H_{,\eta}^n -  \nabla \cdot \mathbf{m}^n) \\
+ c^{n+1} &= c^{n}  + \Delta t M_{\eta}~\nabla \cdot (\nabla (f_{\alpha,c}^n(1-H^{n})+f_{\beta,c}^n H^{n}))
+\end{align}
+$$
+
+In the weak formulation, considering an arbitrary variation $w$, the above equations can be expressed as residual equations:
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+\int_{\Omega}   w  \eta^{n+1}  ~dV &= \int_{\Omega}   w \eta^{n} -   w    \Delta t M_{\eta}~ ((f_{\beta,c}^n-f_{\alpha,c}^n)H_{,\eta}^n - \kappa \Delta \eta^n)  ~dV\\
+&= \int_{\Omega}  w  \left( \underbrace{\eta^{n} - \Delta t M_{\eta}~ ((f_{\beta,c}^n-f_{\alpha,c}^n)H_{,\eta}^n)}_{r_{\eta}} \right)+ \nabla w \cdot \underbrace{(- \Delta t M_{\eta})   \mathbf{m}^n}_{r_{\eta x}} ~dV 
+\end{align}
+$$
+
+and 
+
+$$
+\begin{align}
+\int_{\Omega}   w  c^{n+1}  ~dV &= \int_{\Omega}   w c^{n} + w    \Delta t M_{c}~ \nabla \cdot (\nabla (f_{\alpha,c}^n(1-H^{n})+f_{\beta,c}^n H^{n}))  ~dV\\
+&= \int_{\Omega}   w \underbrace{c^{n}}_{r_c} +  \nabla w   \underbrace{(-\Delta t M_{c})~ [~(f_{\alpha,cc}^n(1-H^{n})+f_{\beta,cc}^n H^{n}) \nabla c + ~((f_{\beta,c}^n-f_{\alpha,c}^n)H^{n}_{,\eta} \nabla \eta) ] }_{r_{cx}} ~dV
+\end{align}
+$$
+
+The above values of $r_{\eta}$, $r_{\eta x}$, $r_{c}$ and $r_{cx}$ are used to define the residuals in the following equations file: 
+`applications/CHAC\_anisotropy/equations.h`
+
+