Merge pull request #142 from risk-first/practice-pages

Fixed link
risk-first · Jan 15, 2025 · fc8b44d · fc8b44d
2 parents 0de1aaf + 642bdca
commit fc8b44d
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md b/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md
@@ -166,12 +166,12 @@ All I need to do is "weigh up" the change in risks as best as I can.  A lot of t
 
 So far, we've been looking at each task individually, working out which risks we're addressing, and which ones we're exposed to as a result.  If you have plenty of spare talent and only a few tasks, then maybe that's enough and you can get to work on all the tasks that have a positive [Payoff](/tags/Payoff).   But if you're constrained, then you should be hunting for the [actions](/tags/Take-Action) with the biggest [Payoff](/tags/Payoff) and doing those first.
 
-Things change too when you have a whole team engaged in the planning process.  Although people will generally agree on what the risks _are_, they often will disagree on the [Probability they will occur, or the impact if they do](/thinking/Track-Risk#risk-registers).   In cases like these, you might want to allow each stakeholder to "vote up" the risks they consider significant, or vote up the actions they consider to have high [Payoff](/tags/Payoff).  This will be covered in further detail in the [next section](Stop-Estimating-Start-Navigating).
-
-But for now, let's talk about in which ways this is better or worse than Planning Poker.
+Things change too when you have a whole team engaged in the planning process.  Although people will generally agree on what the risks _are_, they often will disagree on the [Probability they will occur, or the impact if they do](/thinking/Track-Risk#risk-registers).   In cases like these, you might want to allow each stakeholder to "vote up" the risks they consider significant, or vote up the actions they consider to have high [Payoff](/tags/Payoff).  
 
 ## Some Points To Note
 
+Let's talk about in which ways this is better or worse than Planning Poker.
+
 ![Instead of Estimates](/img/generated/estimating/planner/estimates.svg)
 
 - **We've made explicit the trade-offs for carrying out pieces of work**.  If [building the right thing](Fixing-Scrum#10x) is the most important thing we can do, then making sure the whole team are on the same page with respect to what the pros or cons might be.