Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.1 sets and n-types #15

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions mkdocs.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ nav:
- "2.14 Example: equality of structures": 1-foundations/2-homotopy-type-theory/14-example-equality-of-structures.rzk.md
- 2.15 Universal properties: 1-foundations/2-homotopy-type-theory/15-universal-properties.rzk.md
- Exercises: 1-foundations/2-homotopy-type-theory/exercises/README.md
- 3 Sets and Logic:
- 3.1 Sets and n-types: 1-foundations/3-sets-and-logic/01-sets-and-n-types.rzk.md

markdown_extensions:
- admonition
Expand Down
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions src/1-foundations/2-homotopy-type-theory/08-the-unit-type.rzk.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,3 +5,41 @@ This is a literate Rzk file:
```rzk
#lang rzk-1
```

!!! note "Lemma. Any two elements of $\mathbb{1}$ are equal"
For any $x,y:\mathbb{1}$, we have $x = y$.

```rzk
#def units-eq
(x y : Unit)
: x = y
:= path-concat Unit x unit y (Unit-uniq x) (path-sym Unit y unit (Unit-uniq y))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be noted that refl also works here, since the uniqueness principle is actually built into Rzk for Unit and (dependent) pairs (Σ-types). See uniq-prod' and uniq-Unit' in the recent Rzk demo at https://fizruk.github.io/bmstu-rzk-demo-2023

```

!!! note "Theorem 2.8.1."
For any $x,y:\mathbb{1}$, we have $(x=y) \simeq \mathbb{1}$.

```rzk
#def paths-in-unit-equiv-unit
(x y : Unit)
: equivalence (x = y) Unit
-- provide a function - a constant map to unit
:= ( \ (p : x = y) → unit, (
-- provide right inverse - a constant map to an inhabitant of x = y
(\ (u : Unit) → units-eq x y,
-- prove that composition is homotopical to id_Unit, via the proof that any inhabitant of unit is equal to unit
\ (u : Unit) → path-sym Unit u unit (Unit-uniq u)),
-- provide left same inverse (choose same as right inverse)
(\ (u : Unit) → units-eq x y,
-- prove that composition is homotopical to id_{x = y}, in other words, that
-- concatenation of paths (x = unit) and (unit = y) is equal to p; use path induction on p to show that
-- concatenation of paths (x = unit) and (unit = x) is equal to refl, with the "concat with inverse is refl" theorem
\ (p : x = y) → path-ind
Unit
( \ x' y' p' → units-eq x' y' = p')
( \ x' → inverse-r Unit x' unit (Unit-uniq x'))
x y p
)
))
```

47 changes: 47 additions & 0 deletions src/1-foundations/3-sets-and-logic/01-sets-and-n-types.rzk.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
# 3.1 Sets and $n$-types

This is a literate Rzk file:

```rzk
#lang rzk-1
```

In general, types behave like spaces or higher groupoids, but there is a subclass of types that behave more like sets in a traditional sense.
We expect a type to be a set, if there is no higher homotopical information.

!!! note "Definition 3.1.1."
A type $A$ is a **set** if for all $x, y : A$ and all $p, q : x = y$, we have $p = q$.

```rzk
#def isSet
(A : U)
: U
:= (x : A) → (y : A) → (p : x = y) → (q : x = y) → (p = q)
```

!!! note "Example 3.1.2."
The type $\mathbb{1}$ is a set.

```rzk
#def unit-isSet
: isSet Unit
:= \ x y p q → 3-path-concat
(x = y)
-- p = f_inv (f(p)) = f_inv (f(q)) = q
p
((first (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)))) ((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) p))
((first (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)))) ((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) q))
q
-- p = f_inv (f(p)) : use the proof embedded in the equivalence
(path-sym (x = y) (((first (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)))) ((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) p))) p
((second (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)))) p))
-- f_inv (f(p)) = f_inv (f(q)) : use the fact that f(p) and f(q) are of type Unit and therefore there is equality between them
(ap
Unit (x = y)
(first (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y))))
((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) p)
((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) q)
(units-eq ((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) p) ((first (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)) q)))
-- f_inv (f(q)) = q : use the proof embedded in the equivalence
((second (second (second (paths-in-unit-equiv-unit x y)))) q)
```