Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix build of nix flake on aarch64-darwin #181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

geffk2
Copy link
Collaborator

@geffk2 geffk2 commented Apr 15, 2024

Upgraded the nixpkgs revision to more recent to include fixes (NixOS/nixpkgs#258280) to most haskell packages not building on aarch64-darwin.
Also updated ghc to 9.6.3 as it seems 9.6.2 was dropped from nixpkgs along the way(?)

@fizruk fizruk requested a review from deemp April 16, 2024 09:34
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@

rzk = "rzk";
rzk-js = "rzk-js";
ghcVersion = "ghc962";
ghcVersion = "ghc963";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably 964 will also be OK.

Copy link
Member

@fizruk fizruk Apr 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we maybe even use 9.6.5? It has been released yesterday :)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it's in nixpkgs just yet

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's in nixpkgs, but I suggest we wait some time (#182), then update again. The nixpkgs version in this PR is OK for now.

@fizruk fizruk merged commit 8bda152 into rzk-lang:develop Apr 24, 2024
1 check passed
@fizruk fizruk mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants