-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add validation for destination of atomic operations #6093
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ecdc1e
Reimplement the GLSL atomic* functions in terms of __intrinsic_op
aleino-nv b33fc07
Add validation for atomic operations
aleino-nv 2d16a1b
Add tests for GLSL atomics destination validation
aleino-nv 3c1e4f8
Validate atomic operations after address space specialization
aleino-nv d2f0eb1
Allow unchecked in/inout parameters for non-SPIRV targets
aleino-nv c32ab5f
Clean up callees left without uses during address space specialziation
aleino-nv 240b905
format code
slangbot fc57786
Merge pull request #40 from slangbot/format-6093-aleino/atomics
aleino-nv f4b4041
Merge branch 'master' into aleino/atomics
aleino-nv efb9dbb
Merge branch 'master' into aleino/atomics
csyonghe File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could mean we will still be generating errors when emitting hlsl or other non-spirv target code.
I think we should amend
validateAtomicOperations
such that for any non-spirv target code, we silently treat inout/outIRParam
as valid target for atomic operations for now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked that it works for Metal, at least. (Address space specialization is run in Metal IR legalization, which happens before this point in the code.)
Sure, then I guess I don't need two separate call sites for this function. (Edit: well, not if we only make the exception for non-SPIR-V targets... I'll keep the separate call site then.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done: I added a parameter that lets the caller specify whether to skip full IRParam checks in this way.
The caller can set this parameter to false for SPIR-V and true for other targets.