Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add MarkIfFlagPresentThenOthersRequired #2200

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

faizan-siddiqui
Copy link

This PR introduces a new flag group function, MarkIfFlagPresentThenOthersRequired, which enforces a "one-way required together" relationship among flags. This means that if a primary flag is set, then other dependent flags must also be set. This allows users to make certain flags conditionally required based on the presence of another flag, while maintaining flexibility when the primary flag is not provided.

Example

Consider a command called get-range that uses the flags --start and --end to specify a date range. By default, the command can run without either flag, using default start and end values (e.g., start=someDefaultStart and end=Now). However, you may want to enforce that if the user specifies an --end, they must also specify a --start.

cmd := &cobra.Command{
    Use: "get-range",
}

cmd.Flags().String("start", "", "Start date")
cmd.Flags().String("end", "", "End date")

// If --end is set, --start is required
cmd.MarkIfFlagPresentThenRequired("end", "start")
  • If the command is called with only --end=value, it will trigger an error because --start is missing.
  • If called without any flags or only with --start, it will run using the default values or the provided start date.

This change makes it easier to enforce dependencies between flags while allowing flexible defaults when the primary flag is not specified.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 23, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@faizan-siddiqui
Copy link
Author

@marckhouzam Would love to get this in thanks! Let me know if you have any questions :)

@faizan-siddiqui
Copy link
Author

@dpetersen @markbates @EdwardBetts Would love to get this in thanks! Let me know if you have any questions :)

@danpalmer
Copy link

@marckhouzam is there anything we can do to get this moving? Alternatively we're happy to have discussions about it being out of scope, it just felt fairly obviously useful to us.

@marckhouzam
Copy link
Collaborator

I like the idea. I’ll put it on my queue to review. Thank you.

Comment on lines +255 to +260
if len(unset) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf(
"if the first flag in the group [%v] is set, all other flags must be set; the following flags are not set: %v",
flagList, unset,
)
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if len(unset) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf(
"if the first flag in the group [%v] is set, all other flags must be set; the following flags are not set: %v",
flagList, unset,
)
}
if len(unset) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf(
"%v is set, all other flags [%v] must be set; the following flags are not set: %v",
flagList[0], flagList[1:], unset,
)
}

Maybe something like this would be more readable and understood

Or this

Suggested change
if len(unset) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf(
"if the first flag in the group [%v] is set, all other flags must be set; the following flags are not set: %v",
flagList, unset,
)
}
if len(unset) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf(
"%v is set, the following flags must be provided: %v",
flagList[0], unset,
)
}

desc: "No flags no problem even with conflicting groups",
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b"},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test about using

Suggested change
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b", "b a"},

This one is similar to the required group that also exists.

Then, it's up to you to decide if it should be discouraged or not

Please also consider adding a test about

Suggested change
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b", "a c"},

Sane here, you should decide if you want to discourage it or not

Same about a test about

Suggested change
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b c", "a c b"},
Suggested change
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b"},
flagGroupsIfPresentThenRequired: []string{"a b c", "b c"},

I'm asking for all these tests because I'm unsure how it would be expected to work

@@ -221,6 +278,7 @@ func sortedKeys(m map[string]map[string]bool) []string {
// - when a flag in a group is present, other flags in the group will be marked required
// - when none of the flags in a one-required group are present, all flags in the group will be marked required
// - when a flag in a mutually exclusive group is present, other flags in the group will be marked as hidden
// - when the first flag in an if-present-then-required group is present, the second flag will be marked as required

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// - when the first flag in an if-present-then-required group is present, the second flag will be marked as required
// - when the first flag in an if-present-then-required group is present, the other flags will be marked as required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants