Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

golangci-lint: add gofmt #5738

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

golangci-lint: add gofmt #5738

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

c4rlo
Copy link
Contributor

@c4rlo c4rlo commented Dec 20, 2024

Note that unlike goimports (which we already use and which includes most of the gofmt functionality), this gofmt linter is equivalent to gofmt -s i.e. including some code simplifications.

Bring current code base into compliance with the new linter (by running gofmt -w -s on all affected files).

Note that unlike goimports (which we already use and which includes most
of the gofmt functionality), this gofmt linter is equivalent to "gofmt
-s" i.e. including some code simplifications.

Bring current code base into compliance with the new linter.

Signed-off-by: Carlo Teubner <[email protected]>
@zmt
Copy link
Contributor

zmt commented Jan 7, 2025

We should consider https://github.com/mvdan/gofumpt.

@amartinezfayo
Copy link
Member

We should consider https://github.com/mvdan/gofumpt.

gofumpt is an interesting option. I would go ahead and introduce the gofmt linter now and consider the use of gofumpt in the future.

Copy link
Member

@amartinezfayo amartinezfayo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @c4rlo!

@amartinezfayo amartinezfayo merged commit 68ee015 into spiffe:main Jan 9, 2025
35 checks passed
@amartinezfayo amartinezfayo added this to the 1.11.2 milestone Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants