Review syntactic relations

content/docs/general_guideline/SUD_features/Subject.md

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The `@x` feature is now deprecated and must not be used in new annotations.
 #text = Dieu (Ned Flanders) leur apprend qu'il est interdit de manger les fruits de l'arbre.
 1	Dieu	Dieu	PROPN	_	_	7	subj	_	_
 2	(	(	PUNCT	_	_	3	punct	_	SpaceAfter=No
-3	Ned	Ned	PROPN	_	_	1	appos	_	_
+3	Ned	Ned	PROPN	_	_	1	conj:appos	_	_
 4	Flanders	Flanders	PROPN	_	_	3	flat@name	_	SpaceAfter=No
 5	)	)	PUNCT	_	_	3	punct	_	_
 6	leur	lui	PRON	_	Number=Plur|Person=3|PronType=Prs	7	comp:obl	_	_

content/docs/general_guideline/Syntactic_relations/comp/_index.md

@@ -1,22 +1,29 @@
 ---
-title: "comp"
-weight: 1
+title: "comp…"
+weight: 3
 # bookFlatSection: false
 # bookToc: true
 # bookHidden: false
+# bookHidden: false
 bookCollapseSection: true
 # bookComments: false
 # bookSearchExclude: false
 ---
 
-# comp
+# `comp` and extensions 
 
 ## Universal
 
 The `comp` relation is used for arguments of verbs, nouns, adjectives, adverbs, auxiliaries, adpositions and conjunctions.
 
-This relation is refined into several sub-relations: [`comp:aux`](./comp_aux) (auxiliary argument), [`comp:cleft`](./comp_cleft) (cleft clauses), [`comp:obj`](./comp_obj) (direct object),[`comp:obl`](./comp_obl) (oblique argument), [`comp:pred`](./comp_pred) (predicative argument).
+This relation is refined into several extensions: 
+ - [`comp:aux`](./comp_aux) (auxiliary argument)
+ - [`comp:cleft`](./comp_cleft) (cleft clauses)
+ - [`comp:obj`](./comp_obj) (direct object)
+ - [`comp:obl`](./comp_obl) (oblique argument)
+ - [`comp:pred`](./comp_pred) (predicative argument)
 
-In most cases, SUD native corpora are directly annotated with the sub-relations, rather than with the `comp` relation. However, `comp` may sometimes be used when one has difficulty deciding between `comp:obj` and `comp:obl`.
+In most cases, SUD native corpora are directly annotated with the extensions, rather than with the `comp` relation.
+However, `comp` may sometimes be used when one has difficulty deciding between `comp:obj` and `comp:obl`.
 
-You can find more examples in this [table](http://tables.grew.fr/?data=sud_deps/comp)
+A global view of `comp` usage in the last release (2.13) of SUD if given in this [table](http://tables.grew.fr/?data=sud_deps/comp).

content/docs/general_guideline/Syntactic_relations/comp/comp.md

@@ -9,27 +9,27 @@ bookToc: true
 # bookSearchExclude: false
 ---
 
-# comp 
+# `comp` 
 
 ## Universal  
 
-The `comp` relation is used for arguments of verbs, nouns, adjectives, adverbs, auxiliaries, adpositions and conjunctions.
+The `comp` relation (without extension) is used when one has difficulty deciding between `comp:obj` and `comp:obl`.
 
-This relation is refined into several sub-relations: [`comp:aux`](./comp_aux) (auxiliary argument), [`comp:cleft`](./comp_cleft) (cleft clauses), [`comp:obj`](./comp_obj) (direct object),[`comp:obl`](./comp_obl) (oblique argument), [`comp:pred`](./comp_pred) (predicative argument).
-
-In most cases, SUD native corpora are directly annotated with the sub-relations, rather than with the `comp` relation. However, `comp` may sometimes be used when one has difficulty deciding between `comp:obj` and `comp:obl`.
+## French
 
-You can find more examples in this [table](http://tables.grew.fr/?data=sud_deps/comp)
+{{<grew key1="e.label" corpus="SUD_French-GSD@latest" >}}
+pattern { e: X -[1=comp, !2]-> Y }
+{{</grew>}}
 
-## French
 
 ### Overview
 
-In **French**, the `comp` label is frequently used to annotate reflexive pronouns and other pronominal clitics which contribute to the formation of pronominal verbs when it is difficult to determine the role of a pronoun. In constructions such as *Il s'en sort* the pronoun *se* no longer provides the semantic value of an argument of the verb. However, it fits so well into the typical argument structure that it is hard to recognize that it cannot be de-pronominalized. For this reason, we annotate the relation with a `comp` label.
-
-> Example 
+In **French**, the `comp` label is frequently used to annotate reflexive pronouns and other pronominal clitics which contribute to the formation of pronominal verbs when it is difficult to determine the role of the pronoun.
+In constructions such as *Il s'en sort* (en: *He's doing well*) the pronoun *se* no longer provides the semantic value of an argument of the verb.
+However, it fits so well into the typical argument structure that it is hard to recognize that it cannot be de-pronominalized.
+For this reason, it is annotated with the `comp` relation.
 
-{{< conll >}}
+> {{< conll >}}
 # text = Il s'en sort bien
 # text_en = He's doing well
 1	Il	il	PRON	_	_	4	subj	_	Gloss=he
@@ -40,19 +40,15 @@ In **French**, the `comp` label is frequently used to annotate reflexive pronoun
 {{< /conll >}}
 
 
-> Example 
-
-{{< conll >}}
+> {{< conll >}}
 # text = Il se souvient
 # text_en = He remembers
 1	Il	il	PRON	_	_	3	subj	_	Gloss=he
 2	se	se	PRON	_	_	3	comp	_	Gloss=himself
 3	souvient	souvenir	VERB	_	_	0	root	_	Gloss=remembers
 {{< /conll >}}
 
-> Example 
-
-{{< conll >}}
+> {{< conll >}}
 # text = Christine en veut à son amie
 # text_en = Christine is angry at her friend
 1	Christine	Christine	PROPN	_	_	3	subj	_	Gloss=Christine
@@ -65,12 +61,10 @@ In **French**, the `comp` label is frequently used to annotate reflexive pronoun
 
 ### Deep syntactic features
 
-In the case of **passive reflexive constructions**, the pronoun is labelled `comp` with the deep syntactic feature @[`pass`](../../Deep/pass.md).
+In the case of **passive reflexive constructions**, the pronoun is labelled `comp` with the deep syntactic feature [`@pass`](../../Deep/pass.md).
 
 
-> Example 
-
-{{< conll >}}
+> {{< conll >}}
 # text = Il se situe à environ 13 kilomètres au nord-ouest
 # text_en = It is situated about 13 kilometers to the north-west
 1	Il	il	PRON	_	Gender=Masc|Number=Sing|Person=3|PronType=Prs	3	subj@pass	_	wordform=il|Gloss=it
@@ -86,10 +80,9 @@ In the case of **passive reflexive constructions**, the pronoun is labelled `com
 10	nord-ouest	nord-ouest	NOUN	_	Gender=Masc|Number=Sing	8	comp:obj	_	Gloss=north-west
 {{< /conll >}}
 
-We can also have the deep syntactic feature [`@expl`](../../Deep/expl.md) for the label ̀`comp`. 
+We can also have the deep syntactic feature [`@expl`](../../Deep/expl.md) for the label `comp`. 
 
-> Example 
-{{<conll>}}
+> {{<conll>}}
 # text = euh, il y a un stade aussi à côté.
 1	euh	euh	INTJ	_	_	5	discourse	_	SpaceAfter=No
 2	,	,	PUNCT	_	_	1	punct	_	_
@@ -104,8 +97,7 @@ We can also have the deep syntactic feature [`@expl`](../../Deep/expl.md) for th
 11	.	.	PUNCT	_	_	5	punct	_	_
 {{</conll>}}
 
-You can find more information on the [`pronomional verb`](../../../language/French/syntax/french_pronominal_verb.md) page or on the [`il y a`](../../../language/French/syntax/il_y_a.md) annotation page. 
-
+More information can be found on the French [pronomional verb](../../../language/French/syntax/french_pronominal_verb.md) page or on the page about the annotation of the idiom [*il y a*](../../../language/French/syntax/il_y_a.md).
 
 {{<agg comp_french>}}
 

content/docs/general_guideline/Syntactic_relations/comp/comp_aux.md

@@ -9,24 +9,21 @@ bookToc: true
 # bookSearchExclude: false
 ---
 
-# comp:aux
-
+# `comp:aux`
 
 ## Universal
 
-The `comp:aux` relation is used for the argument of auxiliaries.
-
-The relation `comp:aux` can be used with the following deep features:
+The relation `comp:aux` is used for the argument of auxiliaries.
+It can be used with the following deep features:
  - [`@tense`](../../Deep/tense.md)
  - [`@pass`](../../Deep/pass.md)
  - [`@caus`](../../Deep/caus.md)
 
-```grew
+{{< grew >}}
 pattern { GOV-[comp:aux]->DEP }
-```
+{{< /grew >}}
 
-
-> English
+> **English**
 {{<conll>}}
 1	Do	do	AUX	_	_	0	root	_	_
 2	you	you	PRON	_	_	1	subj	_	_
@@ -35,7 +32,7 @@ pattern { GOV-[comp:aux]->DEP }
 {{</conll>}}
 
 
-> English
+> **English**
 {{<conll>}}
 1	It	it	PRON	_	_	2	subj	_	_
 2	had	had	AUX	_	_	0	root	_	_
@@ -45,10 +42,9 @@ pattern { GOV-[comp:aux]->DEP }
 6	.	.	PUNCT	_	_	2	punct	_	_
 {{</conll >}}
 
-
 Multiple auxiliaries, such as those permitted in [English varieties spoken in the Southeastern United States](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_American_English), are annotated as so.
 
-> Southern American English
+> **Southern American English**
 {{<conll>}}
 # text_en = We might be able to go.
 1	We	we	PRON	_	_	2	subj	_	_
@@ -59,7 +55,7 @@ Multiple auxiliaries, such as those permitted in [English varieties spoken in th
 {{</conll>}}
 
 
-> Naija
+> **Naija**
 {{<conll>}}
 # text_en = I can't even sleep.
 1	I	I	PRON	_	Case=Nom|Number=Sing|Person=1|PronType=Prs	3	subj	_	Gloss=I
@@ -70,7 +66,7 @@ Multiple auxiliaries, such as those permitted in [English varieties spoken in th
 {{</conll>}}
 
 
-> Slovak
+> **Slovak**
 {{<conll>}}
 # text = Ak by som mal podobnú šancu, ja ju nepremrhám.
 # text_en = If I had a similar chance, I wouldn't waste it
@@ -87,7 +83,7 @@ Multiple auxiliaries, such as those permitted in [English varieties spoken in th
 {{</conll>}}
 
 
-> Wolof
+> **Wolof**
 {{<conll>}}
 # text = Képp ku wuute dees na la mbugal.
 # text_en = Every man that is missing is punished (for you)
@@ -101,7 +97,7 @@ Multiple auxiliaries, such as those permitted in [English varieties spoken in th
 {{</conll>}}
 
 
-> German
+> **German**
 {{<conll>}}
 # text_en = It was agreed with the group of investors not to disclose any information.
 1	Mit	Mit	ADP	APPR	AdpType=Prep|Case=Dat	4	udep	_	Gloss=with

content/docs/general_guideline/Syntactic_relations/comp/comp_cleft.md

@@ -9,14 +9,13 @@ bookToc: true
 # bookSearchExclude: false
 ---
 
-# comp:cleft 
+# `comp:cleft` 
 
 ## Universal 
 
 The `comp:cleft` relation is used in cleft sentences for the dependency from the head of the sentence to the head of the complement clause.
 
 > **English**
-
 {{< conll >}}
 1	It	it	PRON	_	_	2	subj	_	_
 2	was	be	AUX	_	_	0	root	_	_
@@ -29,9 +28,7 @@ The `comp:cleft` relation is used in cleft sentences for the dependency from the
 9	news	news	NOUN	_	_	7	comp:obj	_	_
 {{< /conll >}}
 
-
 > **French**
-
 {{< conll >}}
 # text = C'est alors Alba qui reprend le contrôle de la situation et qui réprime une révolte du peuple devant la cour royale
 # text_en = So it was then Alba who retook control of the situation and quelled a popular revolt before the royal court.
@@ -66,8 +63,7 @@ Sometimes, there is an ambiguity between a relative clause and a cleft clause. C
 
 If someone utters this sentence in a context where they must choose between a gasoline car and an electric car, the sentence is interpreted as a cleft sentence with the following annotation.
 
-> **English**
-
+> **English** (cleft analysis)
 {{< conll >}}
 1	It	it	PRON	_	_	2	subj	_	_
 2	is	be	AUX	_	_	0	root	_	_
@@ -81,8 +77,7 @@ If someone utters this sentence in a context where they must choose between a ga
 
 But if the sentence is uttered in a context where the speaker is referring to one of several electric cars, the sentence is interpreted as having a relative clause with the following annotation.
 
-> **English**
-
+> **English** (relative analysis)
 {{< conll >}}
 1	It	it	PRON	_	_	2	subj	_	_
 2	is	be	AUX	_	_	0	root	_	_