-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LiveComponent] Add support for downloading files from LiveActions (Experimental) #2483
base: 2.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📊 Packages dist files size differenceThanks for the PR! Here is the difference in size of the packages dist files between the base branch and the PR.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This solution is so simple 🤩
throw new Error('Invalid LiveDownload response'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
const fileSize = Number.parseInt(headers.get('Content-Length') || '0'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really want to assume that if Content-Length
header is absent, then it is equal to 0
?
In which case the header can be absent? (I didn't see the rest of the PR yet!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In which case the header can be absent?
It should not be. This method is not made to stream movies, but files generated using the liveprops values.
Elsewhen, developers should send an URL to the JS and then open some stream, or redirect to another page, etc...
that if Content-Length header is absent, then it is equal to 0
No, absolutely not. But if it is unknown, we need to compute it on the fly then. Not implemented yet, but linked to the other questions below :)
if (fileSize > 10000000) { | ||
throw new Error('File is too large to download (10MB limit)'); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More correct and easier to understand:
if (fileSize > 10000000) { | |
throw new Error('File is too large to download (10MB limit)'); | |
} | |
if (fileSize > 10 * 1024 * 1024) { | |
throw new Error('File is too large to download (10MB limit)'); | |
} |
Also, why do you want to limit the file size? It can be a nice feature, but shouldn't it be configurable by the developer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the part we need to discuss. Don't forget the user has NOT accepted this download in any way for now.
Also, you cannot store 1GB in the DOM before saving the file.
We have options after:
- streaming toward the FileStorage api (where user would then decide where and how to save the file)
- allowing this only on button with attribute "download" (my preference for now)
if (!$event->getControllerResult()->headers->has(self::DOWNLOAD_HEADER)) { | ||
|
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dead code
if ((!$file instanceof SplFileInfo)) { | ||
throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('The file "%s" does not exist.', $file)); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure to understand when this code can be executed, $file
can either be a string
or SplFileInfo
, and when it's a string
, we re-assign $file
to a SplFileInfo
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the condition is wrong?
parent::__construct($file, 200, [ | ||
self::HEADER_LIVE_DOWNLOAD => 1, | ||
'Content-Disposition' => HeaderUtils::makeDisposition(HeaderUtils::DISPOSITION_ATTACHMENT, $filename ?? basename($file)), | ||
'Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we use the $file
's mime type?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hesitated (keep dep light) and chose not to...
But in fact it's a good idea and Mime is a very small component.
So let's make it a requirement for LiveComponent ? Or only when using downloads / uploads ?
wdyt ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest to put it in suggest
composer.json
section (I don't remember what is the rule in Symfony, cc @nicolas-grekas), and then runtime check if symfony/mime
exists (when using downloads/uploads)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pretty sure there is no suggest in Symfony composer packages..
We have other situations in UX where we do not require a package (i.e. in Autocomplete for Form ..)
My question was more: should we require it for everyone, or keep it as an "runtime" dependency ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
runtime dependency
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why aren't you deferring to BinaryFileResponse for this logic?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason for the header?
In the frontend, if not a standard/known content type, but has a content disposition (and an other requirements), trigger the download? This way we could say "to enable file downloads, return a response that has a content disposition"
Co-authored-by: Hugo Alliaume <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hugo Alliaume <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hugo Alliaume <[email protected]>
What about streams from flysystem? We'll need to always load files into memory? |
With that method, i fear yes. That's why the limit. And browsers can change their policy soon to prevent abuse. We also can ask for a Filesystem API grant. Again, will need to test one way or the other, locally i can stream a full 8GB file in one second so ... :| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is awesome! I'll let someone else review the frontend code.
For the back end:
- I wish we weren't restricted to
BinaryFileResponse
- I'd like to be able to use with StreamedResponse and a resource. - What are the requirements for a response to trigger as a download on the frontend? Just the special header? Could we add this header in the response event listener (detect if it's a download)?
parent::__construct($file, 200, [ | ||
self::HEADER_LIVE_DOWNLOAD => 1, | ||
'Content-Disposition' => HeaderUtils::makeDisposition(HeaderUtils::DISPOSITION_ATTACHMENT, $filename ?? basename($file)), | ||
'Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why aren't you deferring to BinaryFileResponse for this logic?
How so ? BinaryFile does not add content disposition different than what you pass here as argument. |
I need to continue looking, but the restriction is not here at all, there is just an helper we can provide to offer the best DX possible. The difficulty is to ensure a ResponseStream will work (without crashing the LiveComponent thread) and this is where problems come from:
And regarding streaming. I made it work perfectly at home. But i have still not see any use case where downloading a 500MB file via a LiveComponent is a good idea 😅 Anyway we'll need to test IRL a bit to get feedback, issues, etc etc |
throw new Error('No filename found in Content-Disposition header'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
const blob = await backendResponse.getBlob(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It depends... if you trigger the "click" and the file start downloading I think browser play the "pipe" role here.
But during my test I managed to crashed pretty violently Chrome and Safari multiple times.
But it's a good idea to reduce resource usage in case memory limit is low. |
This pull request introduces a new experimental feature for handling file downloads in
LiveActions
.Caution
As stated here, this feature -if merged- will keep an experimental status, for everyone to test and see how it goes. We cannot ensure BC promise on features without testing it IRL first.
TL;DR;
Works perfectly with existing files from the Filesystem.
Works also with file generated at runtime.
Also
I started the demo, just need to complete some texts + add a bit of style
Scope of this
This PR taks a very narrow scope on this thing, i already started working on cool things for upload (as I also needed to for work..)
Let's stay focus on this here (discussions / issues open for any new idea / MR)