Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add layouts to the DWDS #663

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add layouts to the DWDS #663

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

CamLamb
Copy link
Contributor

@CamLamb CamLamb commented Jul 16, 2024

No description provided.

@CamLamb CamLamb changed the base branch from main to pattern-lib-bookmarks July 16, 2024 12:22
@CamLamb CamLamb force-pushed the pattern-lib-bookmarks branch from f1e73ee to a18f02b Compare July 16, 2024 12:36
@CamLamb CamLamb force-pushed the pattern-lib-dwds-layouts branch from ddc33c4 to 05c64fe Compare July 16, 2024 12:36
@CamLamb CamLamb force-pushed the pattern-lib-bookmarks branch from a18f02b to ae80aeb Compare July 16, 2024 12:41
@CamLamb CamLamb force-pushed the pattern-lib-dwds-layouts branch from 05c64fe to 848b72d Compare July 16, 2024 12:41
@CamLamb CamLamb changed the base branch from pattern-lib-bookmarks to pattern-lib-restructure July 16, 2024 12:42
@CamLamb CamLamb changed the title Pattern Lib 5: Add layouts to the DWDS Add layouts to the DWDS Jul 16, 2024
@CamLamb CamLamb force-pushed the pattern-lib-dwds-layouts branch from 848b72d to 4a5be82 Compare July 16, 2024 15:03
@CamLamb CamLamb changed the base branch from pattern-lib-restructure to main July 16, 2024 15:03
@CamLamb CamLamb marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2024 15:03
@CamLamb CamLamb requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2024 15:03
@marcelkornblum
Copy link
Contributor

I've got quite a lot of feedback about this, and wouldn't mind a discussion.

Top of the list though, is I don't think we will be sticking with anything 1 col most likely, and I think our layouts will be becoming more diverse. I don't think naming 1_col and 2_col is forward thinking in that context.

Also, I'm not totally convinced we need or want the layouts inside the DS, as opposed to in core. Maybe they should be but I'm just not convinced. It's kind of related to the above comment in a way.

Either way please hold off this until it's been chatted about with the team :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants