Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: add build against gmx v2019.6 #1109

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

CI: add build against gmx v2019.6 #1109

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

junghans
Copy link
Member

@junghans junghans commented Feb 15, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (051a06f) 7.0% compared to head (275cb16) 7.0%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1109   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     7.0%    7.0%           
======================================
  Files           4       4           
  Lines         683     683           
======================================
  Hits           48      48           
  Misses        635     635           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@votca-bot votca-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do NOT merge, release-2019 and v2019.6 is the same sha:

commit 328a18d71dda42ca67edf76b2f93781dab6fdf9d (HEAD -> release-2019, tag: v2019.6, origin/test, origin/release-2019)
Author: Paul Bauer <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Feb 24 15:54:18 2020 +0100

    Version 2019.6

    Set DOI strings.
    Updated regressiontest hash.

    Change-Id: If7c04fbd26756275daea1c252ef977a367669b42

gromacs/gromacs@328a18d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants