Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend the ability to publish Registries to IG/AB/TAG #972

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Jan 8, 2025

See #902


Preview | Diff

@frivoal frivoal added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Jan 8, 2025
@frivoal frivoal requested a review from fantasai January 8, 2025 08:49
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiny typo

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
index.bs Outdated
@@ -4702,15 +4702,15 @@ Registry Definitions</h4>
and which is responsible for evaluating whether such requests
satisfy the criteria defined in the [=registry definition=].

The [=custodian=] may be the [=Working Group=], the [=Team=], or a delegated entity.
The [=custodian=] may be the initiating [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected group=], the [=Team=], or a delegated entity.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can simplify this to "[=group=]", no?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[=group=] on its own links to a definition that also includes the AC. I don't think the AC should be in the business of publishing anything

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: fantasai <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a reasonable improvement, and I agree with the replies from @frivoal to suggested changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, have made suggestions to remove probably unnecessary wording.

index.bs Outdated
Comment on lines 4724 to 4726
[=Registries=] can be published by [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected groups=] either
as a stand-alone [=technical report=] on the [=Registry Track=] called a <dfn>registry report</dfn>,
or incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
or, in the case of [=Working Groups=], incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This wording could be misunderstood to mean that chartered groups that are not Working Groups can publish registry reports, but that Working Groups can only incorporate them into Recommendations.

Suggested change
[=Registries=] can be published by [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected groups=] either
as a stand-alone [=technical report=] on the [=Registry Track=] called a <dfn>registry report</dfn>,
or incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
or, in the case of [=Working Groups=], incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
[=Registries=] can be published by [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected groups=]
as a stand-alone [=technical report=] on the [=Registry Track=] called a <dfn>registry report</dfn>.
[=Working Groups=] have an additional option to incorporate them as part of a [=Recommendation=], as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I like this option best. @fantasai , @TallTed , what do you think? I'd like to take this rephrasing instead of both https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/972/files#r1908141004 and https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/972/files#r1908141327

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Getting there. I suggest some tweaks --

Suggested change
[=Registries=] can be published by [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected groups=] either
as a stand-alone [=technical report=] on the [=Registry Track=] called a <dfn>registry report</dfn>,
or incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
or, in the case of [=Working Groups=], incorporated as part of a [=Recommendation=] as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.
A [=chartered group|chartered=] or [=elected group=] can publish a [=registry=]
as a stand-alone [=technical report=] on the [=Registry Track=],
where it is called a <dfn>registry report</dfn>.
[=Working Groups=] have the additional option of
incorporating a [=registry=] as part of a [=Recommendation=],
as an <dfn oldids="registry-section">embedded registry</dfn>.

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
frivoal and others added 4 commits January 20, 2025 16:16
Co-authored-by: Nigel Megitt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nigel Megitt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nigel Megitt <[email protected]>
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@frivoal frivoal merged commit 01a6ec4 into w3c:main Jan 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the registries--ig-ab-tag branch January 23, 2025 13:12
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Jan 23, 2025
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024/2025 milestone Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants