Test for msgSV.GovCloseChannel

[DongLieu]

1. Summary

Fixes #617

2.Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

3. Implementation details

4. How to test/use

5. Checklist

• Does the Readme need to be updated?

6. Limitations (optional)

7. Future Work (optional)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #695 (ba358fa) into main (7521baa) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #695      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   13.40%   13.45%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         243      243              
  Lines       63047    63047              
==========================================
+ Hits         8450     8483      +33     
+ Misses      53919    53886      -33     
  Partials      678      678              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	13.45% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[ThanhNhann]

lgtm! Nice work @DongLieu, I think you should check the channel is really closed in case successful with this function then we can merge

[ThanhNhann]

And don't forget to update the branch with latest commit of branch main

[DongLieu]

The function you mentioned is in the main branch, but in the repo we use v5.3.1 it doesn't have that function

[ThanhNhann]

You can totally use the logic implemented in the function I mentioned to check that

[DongLieu]

I added a check the channel is actually closed

[joe-bowman]

lgtm

[joe-bowman]

lgtm